Our Blog

Unique Challenges for Marijuana Businesses

Colorado companies involved in the marijuana business face a unique challenge. While other businesses can protect their brands and identities by filing for a federal trademark with the USPTO, the Lanham Act prohibits businesses in the marijuana industry from receiving trademark protection. That leaves Colorado's cannabis entrepreneurs in a tough spot--if they take the time and spend the money to develop a true brand identity, they have no easy protection from competitors copying their brand identity and passing off fake product as genuine. In the absence of federal trademark protection, Colorado businesses need to take advantage of the limited trademark protection available under state law. Ogborn Mihm, LLP is helping one such business defend its brand identity and trademarks in Boulder District Court.  For more, please visit: http://www.businessden.com/2015/08/12/pot-bb-takes-copyright-fight-to-court/. 

  1449 Hits
1449 Hits

Victory in Court of Appeals for Small Business Owner

Ogborn Mihm, LLP partner Thomas Neville obtained a victory for their client, Visible Voices, Inc., over the Division of Unemployment Insurance in a recent Colorado Court of Appeals decision, Visible Voices, Inc. v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the State of Colorado and Division of Unemployment Insurance, 2014 COA 63.  The Division of Unemployment Insurance commenced an audit of a small business, Visible Voices, Inc., that provides instant speech-to-text translation known in the court reporting industry as Computer Assisted Realtime Translation ("CART").  The Division determined that Visible Voices owed back unemployment insurance taxes on 13 workers it determined were "employees" of Visible Voices.  Visible Voices appealed the determination, citing facts that showed the workers were independent contractors who undertook performance of engagements on a limited basis when the Visible Voices owner was unable to perform the services requested of her clients due to a scheduling conflict.  The case was heard by two different hearing officers, and twice by the ICAO before going up on appeal to the Court of the Appeals.  In the Court of Appeals decision, it sided with Visible Voices, holding that the ICAO inappropriately relied on a single-factor test to determine whether the pool of workers Visible Voices occassionally gave work to were independent contractors.  Notably, the Court of Appeals cited with approval to Softrock Geological Services, Inc. v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office, 2012 COA 97, for the proposition that a single-factor test is inappropriate to determine whether a worker is customarily engaged in an independent trade or business related to the services performed.  This Court of Appeals decision was bolstered a few days later by the Colorado Supreme Court's twin decisions in Industrial Claim Appeals Office v. Softrock Geological Services, Inc., 2014 CO 30, and Western Logistics, Inc. v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office, 2014 CO 31, which also rejected a single-factor test for purposes of determining whether an individual is an independent contractor under the Colorado Employment Security Act.

Continue reading
  3050 Hits
3050 Hits

As Predictable as the Seasons

In the nineteenth century, the law of negligence in this country was particularly harsh. While the tort of negligence had developed its present formulation—imposing on all people a duty to act reasonably to prevent foreseeable injuries—the doctrine of contributory negligence led to harsh—often unfair—results. Under the common law doctrine of contributory negligence, in the event that the injured person was at fault—even to the slightest degree—he or she could not recover for his or her injuries. In other words, contributory negligence was a complete defense to a negligence suit.

Continue reading
  27408 Hits
27408 Hits
  • Best Law Firms 2019
  • Primerus
  • Best Law Firms 2018
  • Best Lawyers
  • AV
  • Abota
  • Super Lawers
  • Leaders Forum

Contact Us