Facebook Icon.       LinkedIn Icon.

Clayton E Wire Whistleblower And Qui Tam Attorney Denver Colorado.

Clayton E. Wire

Partner

Clayton “Clay” Wire is a trial lawyer who works with whistleblowers to expose illegal conduct, collect government rewards, and protect them from retaliation.  Clay believes that whistleblowers are people with the moral, ethical, and personal fortitude to speak up when they see illegal conduct and that without them our society would crumble.  He has represented individuals in whistleblower retaliation and bounty cases, including in unique Qui Tam cases and in complex retaliation cases brought by in-house counsel.  He also represents employees in discrimination and harassment cases, as well as contract disputes.  Clay works tirelessly to earn the respect of his clients, adversaries, and peers and has been recognized through awards such as the 2018 Barristers Best for Plaintiff-side Employment Lawyer (Peoples’ Choice), as well as the 2018 Plaintiffs Employment Lawyers Association Case of the Year.

Areas of Practice

  • Business Torts & Fraud
  • Commercial & Contract Litigation
  • Corporation, Partnership & LLC Disputes
  • Employment Litigation
  • Whistleblower & Qui Tam
  • Appellate

Education

  • University of Denver Sturm College of Law, J.D., Order of St. Ives
  • Colorado State University, B.A. in Editorial Journalism and Political Science

Bar Admissions

  • Colorado
  • California
  • U.S. District Court of New Mexico
Experience

Between 2016 and 2018, Clay and his team successfully represented an executive at a publicly traded medical device company when he sued his former employer’s CEO for retaliation in violation of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and achieved a precedent setting appellate victory that expanded the protections for corporate whistleblowers, Genberg v. Porter, 882 F.3d 1249, 1255–56 (10th Cir. 2018)

Experience

When a police officer was shot and killed by a fellow officer in 2012, Clay represented his widow and estate in a civil rights case against the City of Lakewood Police Department, eventually obtaining a $3.5 million settlement, Davies v. Lakewood

Experience

In 2018, Clay was trial counsel for a former CEO who was terminated in violation of his contract, not paid the severance he was owed, and not given the ownership interest he was promised, achieving a $1.2 million jury verdict, Kruel v. ART

Experience

Clay and his team represented a physician who was retaliated against for raising concerns regarding Anti-Kickback Statute and Stark Law violations, and achieved a successful result

Experience

Clay and his team represented Relators in Qui Tam actions brought against mortgage originators and vendors under the False Claims Act, for fraud relating to government backed loans

Experience

Clay and his team, along with co-counsel, represent a CRNA in a non-intervened Qui Tam lawsuit under the False Claims Act relating to fraudulent certifications and attestations required for Medicare and Medicaid anesthesia reimbursement

Experience

Clay represented former in-house attorneys who reported violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act in a retaliation lawsuit alleging violations of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Consumer Financial Protection Act, the Dodd-Frank Act, fraudulent luring, and wrongful discharge, and achieved successful outcomes

Experience

Clay was lead appellate counsel for a courageous woman who sued the Grand Junction Police Department for civil rights violations arising from a rape committed by a Grand Junction Police Officer, Schneider v. Grand Junction

Experience

Clay was lead appellate counsel for a courageous woman who sued the Grand Junction Police Department for civil rights violations arising from a rape committed by a Grand Junction Police Officer, Schneider v. Grand Junction