The Colorado Supreme Court heard argument on Thursday, June 4, 2015 in American Family Mutual Insurance Company v. Hansen, Case No. 14SC99, an insurance bad faith case. At the court of appeals level, the court held that an insurance company’s characterization of a claim for coverage as “fairly debatable” is not enough to establish that the insurance company acted reasonably when it delayed or denied payment of insurance benefits.
At trial, the jury found that the insurance company unreasonably delayed and denied coverage to its insured pursuant to C.R.S. 10-3-1115 and 10-3-1116, and the court thereafter awarded statutory penalties, including attorney fees, costs, and “two times the covered benefit,” or $150,000 ($75,000 x 2). The court of appeals clarified that the appropriate statutory penalty is double the amount of benefits owed and for which payment was delayed–not double the amount of damages awarded by the jury. American Family appealed the ruling, which upheld the trial court’s award of $150,000 plus attorney fees and costs.
Oral arguments at the Colorado Supreme Court are available in audio format, and via streaming video.
May is National Bike Month, a time to encourage more people to try bicycling with…
Bicycling is more than a leisure activity or a means of transportation; it's a lifestyle…
As the weather warms up, our children spend more time on the playground. Alarmingly, playground…
Dissecting Bissonnette Recent Supreme Court decisions have brought both clarity and complexity to arbitration agreements…
From baseball diamonds to soccer fields, every spring, young athletes across the nation lace up…
Distracted driving is the number-one cause of car crashes in the United States. The NHTSA…