Categories: ArticlesFirm News

Victory in Court of Appeals For Small Business Owner

Ogborn Mihm, LLP partner Thomas Neville obtained a victory for their client, Visible Voices, Inc., over the Division of Unemployment Insurance in a recent Colorado Court of Appeals decision, Visible Voices, Inc. v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the State of Colorado and Division of Unemployment Insurance, 2014 COA 63.  The Division of Unemployment Insurance commenced an audit of a small business, Visible Voices, Inc., that provides instant speech-to-text translation known in the court reporting industry as Computer Assisted Realtime Translation (“CART”).  The Division determined that Visible Voices owed back unemployment insurance taxes on 13 workers it determined were “employees” of Visible Voices.  Visible Voices appealed the determination, citing facts that showed the workers were independent contractors who undertook performance of engagements on a limited basis when the Visible Voices owner was unable to perform the services requested of her clients due to a scheduling conflict.

Court of Appeals

The case was heard by two different hearing officers, and twice by the ICAO before going up on appeal to the Court of Appeals.  In the Court of Appeals decision, it sided with Visible Voices, holding that the ICAO inappropriately relied on a single-factor test to determine whether the pool of workers Visible Voices occasionally gave work to were independent contractors.  Notably, the Court of Appeals cited with approval to Softrock Geological Services, Inc. v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office, 2012 COA 97, for the proposition that a single-factor test is inappropriate to determine whether a worker is customarily engaged in an independent trade or business related to the services performed.

This Court of Appeals decision was bolstered a few days later by the Colorado Supreme Court’s twin decisions in Industrial Claim Appeals Office v. Softrock Geological Services, Inc., 2014 CO 30, and Western Logistics, Inc. v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office, 2014 CO 31, which also rejected a single-factor test for purposes of determining whether an individual is an independent contractor under the Colorado Employment Security Act.

Published by
Ogborn Mihm LLP

Recent Posts

The Implications of Markley v. U.S. Bank

Navigating New Jurisdictional Requirements: The Implications of Markley v. U.S. Bank for Diversity and Supplemental…

4 weeks ago

Safety in Sports Concussions: What Every Parent, Athlete, and Coach Should Know

Each September, National Concussion Awareness Day shines a spotlight on an injury that too often…

1 month ago

Safety Tips for Off-Highway Vehicles in Colorado

With breathtaking mountain trails, scenic views, and endless terrain to explore, it's no surprise that…

1 month ago

14 Ogborn Mihm Attorneys Honored in 2026 Best Lawyers® Including A Lawyer of the Year Award

14 Ogborn Mihm Attorneys Honored We are proud to announce that 11 of our attorneys…

2 months ago

Stay Safe This Labor Day: Police Step Up DUI Enforcement to Reduce Accidents

As the unofficial end of summer, Labor Day weekend marks one of the last times…

2 months ago

High-Volume vs. Boutique Personal Injury Law Firms: What Colorado Accident Victims Need to Know

If you've been seriously injured in Colorado and are researching your legal options, choosing the…

2 months ago