Bio-Rad Whistleblower Protected for “Reasonable” Incorrect Claim

Bio-Rad Whistleblower

After only three hours of deliberation, a federal jury in San Francisco determined that Bio-Rad, a life science company, retaliated against its former General Counsel, Sanford Wadler, for reporting violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). Wadler alleged he was fired for reporting possible FCPA violations after he found for reporting documents showing Bio-Rad’s distribution of free products in China. Wadler was fired from the company in June 2013.

In November 2014, Bio-Rad was ordered to pay $55 million in fines after a Department of Justice (DOJ) and Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) found that they had in fact violated the FCPA by making improper payments to officials in Russia, Thailand, and Vietnam in order to win business.

Sarbanes-Oxley Act

The investigation held by the DOJ and SEC found no evidence of violations of FCPA in China, as Wadler’s whistleblower allegations had suggested. The court held that the whistleblower’s belief was nevertheless reasonable and protected under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX). SOX is meant to protect consumers and investors who rely on employee information to guarantee honest business practices.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act prohibits a publicly traded company, or any contractor or agent of such company, from retaliation against an employee who blows-the-whistle on what she reasonably believes to be a violation of statutes prohibiting mail fraud, wire fraud, bank fraud, securities fraud, any rule or regulation of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), or any provision of Federal law relating to fraud against shareholders. Successful whistleblowers are entitled to recover their attorneys’ fees and costs under SOX.

The jury found that Wadler’s whistleblower report about his suspicions in February 2013 was a contributing factor in his termination, therefore violating SOX. Although in trial Bio-Rad claimed the whistleblower was fired for being erratic and hostile, Metadata showed that their unfavorable review was fabricated in July 2013, a month after the whistleblower’s termination. Wadler’s December 2012 review was mostly positive.

The court found that the whistleblower was entitled to $2.9 million in lost wages and stock options, which was then doubled according to the Dodd-Frank Act, which Wadler had also brought a claim under. The Dodd-Frank Act prohibits employers generally from retaliating against whistleblowers who disclose information required under SOX, as well as any other law, rule, or regulation under the jurisdiction of the SEC.

Published by
Clayton E. Wire

Recent Posts

Ogborn Mihm Attorneys Recognized Among Denver’s Legal 500 Elite

Ogborn Mihm is pleased to share that partners Clayton E. Wire and Nicole M. Quintana…

7 days ago

Join OM in Supporting the Invisible Disabilities Association Walk & Roll

Ogborn Mihm is proud to support the Invisible Disabilities Association and its annual Walk &…

1 week ago

Can You Swim After a Concussion?

Yes, you can swim after you've had a concussion, but it's important to wait until…

2 weeks ago

Proving Your Brain Injury Lawsuit

While proving the severity of a brain injury can be challenging, our attorneys focus on…

3 weeks ago

Protections for Whistleblowers from Retaliatory Lawsuits in Colorado

Whistleblowers and the Threat of Retaliatory Lawsuits Clay Wire was recently on the Fraud in…

4 weeks ago

Clay Wire Featured on Fraud in America Podcast Discussing Anti-SLAPP Protections for Whistleblowers

OM partner Clay Wire was recently featured on the Fraud in America podcast, sharing his…

4 weeks ago