Fired for Facebook Posts: Social Media Postings May Constitute Protected “Concerted Activity”

Under a series of recent decisions by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), employees who are retaliated against for posting comments on social media websites regarding work conditions may be protected by Sections 7 and 8 of the National Labor Relations Act. Under these sections, employees have the right to engage in concerted activity for the purpose of “mutual aid or protection,” regarding work conditions. Employers cannot retaliate against employees for exercising such rights.

This protection applies regardless of whether the employees are unionized or not. In one particular case, an employee called her boss a “scumbag” on her Facebook page. She had been reprimanded for a customer complaint, which drew various positive responses from her co-workers. Such activity was found by the NLRB to be a protected activity. It concerned the conditions of the employee’s employment and was joined in by other employees.

The real issue with such postings is usually whether the posting is actually a comment regarding work conditions, or whether it strays into the unprotected area of “opprobrious” comments. “Opprobrious” comments are often characterized as mere gripes and sudden outbursts against management. However, regardless of the details, the NLRB’s recent decisions represent a shift. A shift in application of the decades-old protections for concerted activity to a modern realm of organization and communication. Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, and other social media websites are the newest arenas for collective action of all sorts.

Look no further than the recent Occupy movement and the revolutions across the Arab world for confirmation of this. It’s not surprising the NLRB would defend those that engage in protected activity in these arenas from illegal employment actions. Individuals who have been terminated or otherwise retaliated against for work-related postings on social media websites should contact Ogborn Mihm LLP to discuss their potential claims.

Published by
Clayton E. Wire

Recent Posts

Is Colorado a No-Fault State? How Car Accident Claims Work

Colorado is not a no-fault state. It operates under an at-fault (tort) system, meaning the…

3 weeks ago

Non-Pecuniary vs. Pecuniary Losses: What They Mean for Your Case

Terms such as pecuniary losses and non-pecuniary losses can feel technical and unfamiliar, particularly at…

3 weeks ago

Traumatic Brain Injury Diagnosis: What Doctors Look For

In Denver, people spend significant time on the road, at work, and in active environments.…

4 weeks ago

Can You Sue Someone for a Sports Injury in Colorado?

Yes, potentially. In some cases, injuries result from unsafe conditions, reckless conduct, or failures in…

1 month ago

What Is the Average Settlement for a Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) in Denver?

There is no true or single average settlement for a traumatic brain injury (TBI) in…

1 month ago

What Types of Brain Injuries Can Occur After a Car Accident?

Potential traumatic brain injuries (TBI) sustained in a car accident include: Concussions Brain contusions Coup-contrecoup…

1 month ago