The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is responsible for investigating and making at least preliminary decisions on a number of whistleblower claims. Many whistleblower statutes have an administrative exhaustion requirement that forces whistleblowers to first file a complaint with OSHA, as a prerequisite to ever filing a lawsuit in federal court. Some whistleblower statutes also only permit a whistleblower to litigate his or her claims through the administrative process, without ever being able to bring a lawsuit in federal court. Consequently, it is imperative that whistleblowers who have suffered retaliation timely file their complaint with OSHA, since failure to file a complaint within the prescribed timelines will forfeit even a meritorious claim.
These deadlines are usually measured from the date that the whistleblower first suffers a retaliatory action in response to protected activity. While these deadlines may in some cases be extended in extraordinary circumstances, it is imperative that whistleblowers who have suffered retaliation file a complaint with OSHA as soon as possible.
Some examples of whistleblower retaliation are Discharge, Demotion, Reprimand, Harassment, Hostile Work Environment, Lay-off, Failure to Hire, Failure to Promote, Blacklisting, Failure to Recall, Transfer to Different Job, Change in Duties or Responsibilities, Denial of Overtime, Reduction in Pay, Denial of Benefits, Making a Threat, Intimidation, and Constructive Discharge (deliberately creating an environment so unpleasant that a reasonable person would feel compelled to resign).
CARRYING THE MOMENTUM OF 2025 INTO 2026 As we step into 2026, we are grateful…
When most people hear the name “Ogborn Mihm,” they think “Denver car accident attorney.” And,…
We’re proud to be recognized as one of the 2026 Best Law Firms, earning national…
Ogborn Mihm represented dozens of victims devastated by the 2021 Marshall Fire, securing recoveries for…
Whether you have suffered a car accident, storm damage, or a medical emergency, most people…
Navigating New Jurisdictional Requirements: The Implications of Markley v. U.S. Bank for Diversity and Supplemental…