Colorado Supreme Court Hears Argument in Legal Finance Case

The Colorado Trial Lawyers Association filed an Amicus brief in the case Oasis Legal Finance Group, LLC v. Suthers, 2013SC497, to explain the policy implications of a decision regulating “contingent debt” transactions, the function of legal finance for injured low-income clients, and the role of attorney in those transactions.

Published by
Ogborn Mihm LLP

Recent Posts

Neuroradiology Images in Brain Injury Cases

Neuroradiology Images If a picture is worth a thousand words, what’s the value of a…

5 days ago

Ogborn Mihm Attorneys Earn 2027 Best Lawyers® Honors, Including Two “Lawyer of the Year” Awards

  Ogborn Mihm is pleased to announce its attorneys recognized in the 2027 editions of…

7 days ago

$10.5 million settlement for Petroleum Engineering and Construction Victim

Jason Wesoky and Kylie Schmidt represented farmers in a case involving complex issues of petroleum…

4 weeks ago

Colorado’s New Consumer Protection Laws: Why They Matter to Lawyers and the Public

Every year, legislatures pass dozens of new laws. Most have relatively narrow applications or affect…

2 months ago

Is Colorado a No-Fault State? How Car Accident Claims Work

Colorado is not a no-fault state. It operates under an at-fault (tort) system, meaning the…

3 months ago

Non-Pecuniary vs. Pecuniary Losses: What They Mean for Your Case

Terms such as pecuniary losses and non-pecuniary losses can feel technical and unfamiliar, particularly at…

3 months ago