Sarbanes-Oxley Act Whistleblower Protection Basics

Sarbanes Oxley Act

In an attempt to restore trust in financial markets following the collapse of Enron Corporation, Congress enacted the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in 2002. It’s considered one of the most important whistleblower protection laws due to its diverse administrative, criminal and civil provisions. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act contains significant protections for whistleblowers to ensure that employees can safely disclose information that may harm investors, especially fraud. Modeled on whistleblower laws administered by the U.S. Department of Labor and the Whistleblower Protection Act, these protections are not limited to wrongfully discharged employees. It includes additional requirements to create a more encompassing protection network. It also gives more responsibility to corporations for managing complaints internally.

For example, all companies are required to establish internal avenues to file whistleblower complaints. They are to create procedures to protect the confidentiality of employees who file allegations. SOX also amended the federal obstruction of justice statute to criminalize retaliation against whistleblowers who provide factual information to law enforcement regarding a possible federal offense. SOX, along with the SEC’s regulations, also imposes new ethical standards on attorneys practicing before the SEC. It requires them, under certain circumstances, to become whistleblowers themselves. In fact, attorney whistleblowers may be required to report “up the ladder” internally. Then, if nothing is done to correct the conduct at issue, they are to report externally.

Retaliation

SOX prohibits a publicly traded company, or any contractor or agent of such company, from retaliating against an employee who blows the whistle on what she reasonably believes to be a violation of statutes prohibiting mail fraud, wire fraud, bank fraud, or securities fraud, any rule or regulation of the Securities and Exchange Commission, or any provision of Federal law relating to fraud against shareholders. . Any complaints must be filed with OSHA within 180 days of the violation or discovery of the violation.

After filing, complaints are investigated by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). They eventually issue a final determination that may be appealed for de novo review before an ALJ. The ALJ’s determination may then be appealed to the Administrative Review Board (ARB). Additionally, the “kick-out” provision of SOX allows for a proceeding to be moved to Federal District Court when it has been pending for more than 180 days with OSHA without a determination, and neither the plaintiff nor their counsel has acted in bad faith.
Prevailing employees in a SOX action are entitled to reinstatement and back pay as well as attorney’s fees and costs.

Published by
Clayton E. Wire

Recent Posts

Colorado’s New Consumer Protection Laws: Why They Matter to Lawyers and the Public

Every year, legislatures pass dozens of new laws. Most have relatively narrow applications or affect…

1 month ago

Is Colorado a No-Fault State? How Car Accident Claims Work

Colorado is not a no-fault state. It operates under an at-fault (tort) system, meaning the…

2 months ago

Non-Pecuniary vs. Pecuniary Losses: What They Mean for Your Case

Terms such as pecuniary losses and non-pecuniary losses can feel technical and unfamiliar, particularly at…

2 months ago

Traumatic Brain Injury Diagnosis: What Doctors Look For

In Denver, people spend significant time on the road, at work, and in active environments.…

2 months ago

Can You Sue Someone for a Sports Injury in Colorado?

Yes, potentially. In some cases, injuries result from unsafe conditions, reckless conduct, or failures in…

2 months ago

What Is the Average Settlement for a Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) in Denver?

There is no true or single average settlement for a traumatic brain injury (TBI) in…

2 months ago